Professor Val Napoleon named to the Royal Society of Canada (RSC) College of New Scholars, Artists and Scientists

Congratulations to Professor Val Napoleon, who was named to the  Royal Society of Canada (RSC) College of New Scholars, Artists and Scientists.  Val was confirmed on September 12  along with 70 other Canadians and two other UVIC scholars.

Val holds the Law Foundation Chair of Aboriginal Justice and Governance and founding  Director of the Indigenous Law Research Unit at UVic and is a leading scholar in Indigenous law in Canada.

Please see Uvic’s The Ring article for more about the Val and the other UVIC recipients.

  • Val Napoleon and Hadley Friedland, “An Inside Job: Engaging with Indigenous Legal Traditions Through Stories” (2016)  61:4 McGill Law Journal  725.
  • Val Napoleon, “Tsilhqot’in Law of Consent” (2015) 48:3 University of British Columbia Law Review 873.
  • Val Napoleon & Hadley Friedland, “Gathering the Threads: Developing a Methodology for Researching and Rebuilding Indigenous Legal Traditions” (2015) 1:1 Lakehead Law Journal 16.
  • Emily Snyder, Val Napoleon & John Burrows, “Gender and Violence: Drawing on Indigenous Legal Resources” (2015) 48:2 University of British Columbia Law Review 593.
  • Val Napoleon & Hadley Friedland, “Accessing Tully: Political Philosophy for the Everyday and the Everyone” in Robert Nichols & Jakeet Singh, eds, Freedom and Democracy in an Imperial Context: Dialogues with James Tully (New York: Routledge, 2014). Call Number: JC423 F7517 2014
  • Val Napoleon, “Thinking about Indigenous Legal Orders” in René Provost & Colleen Sheppard, eds, Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism (New York: Springer, 2013). ELECTRONIC
  • Val Napoleon, “Living Together: Gitksan Legal Reasoning as a Foundation for Consent” in Jeremy Webber & Colin McLeod, eds, Between Consenting Peoples: Political Community and the Meaning of Consent (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2010). Call Number: JC328.2 B465 2010
  • Val Napoleon “Aboriginal Discourse: Gender, Identity and Community” in Benjamin J Richardson, Shin Imai & Kent McNeil, eds, Indigenous Peoples and the Law: Comparative and Critical Perspectives (Oxford: Hart, 2009). Call Number: K3247 I53 2009
  • Catherine Bell & Val Napoleon, eds, First Nations Cultural Heritage and Law: Case Studies, Voices, and Perspectives (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2008). Call Number: E78 C2F57 2008

Congratulations Val!

 

What Elsevier’s acquisition of bepress means for legal scholarship: Backgrounder and commentary

A few weeks ago we wrote about the launch of LawArXiv, a new legal scholarship repository aimed at ensuring community ownership of legal scholarship and preventing legal research from being overwhelmed by the profit motivations that govern other repositories. The launch of LawArXiv couldn’t be more timely.

This month Elsevier (a related company to LexisNexis) announced its acquisition of bepress (formerly Berkeley Electronic Press), a scholarly communications company whose services include Digital Commons, an institutional repository platform and expressO, an online article manuscript delivery and management service for law reviews.

The acquisition of bepress is of particular importance to the academic law community as the Digital Commons is currently used by 74% of US law schools with a digital repository. The Digital Commons also includes the Law Commons Network, a  open access database of over 350,000 law related scholarly works, aggregated from across all Digital Commons repositories.

This acquisition is the latest of a string of Elsevier’s recent acquisitions that have expanded its role from a publisher of academic journals to a company seeking to be involved in all aspects of scholarly communication.  This string of acquisitions includes Elsevier’s acquisition last year of the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), an  open access repository for scholarship from a variety of disciplines, including the largest legal scholarship repository Legal Scholarship Network.

See the articles below for a roundup of recent commentary on the acquisition and what it means for legal scholars and the broader academic community.

Robert Ambrogi, “Elsevier Acquires bepress, Open-Access Repository of Law Reviews, Other Scholarly Articles” (August 3, 2017), LawSites (blog), archived at <https://perma.cc/58XA-J62D>.

Paul Basken, “Elsevier is Becoming a Data Company. Should Universities be Wary?” (August 7, 2017), The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Barbara Fister, “Just Business” (August 8, 2017), Inside Higher Ed – Library Babel Fish (blog), archived at <https://perma.cc/4VAF-93GZ>.

Lindsay McKenzie, “Elsevier Expands Footprint in Scholarly Workflow” (August 3, 2017), Inside Higher Ed.

Glyn Moody, “Elsevier Continues to Build its Monopoly Solution for all Aspects of Scholarly Communication” techdirt.

Kevin O’Keefe, “Elsevier acquires bepress: Library and Knowledge Community Respond” (August 3, 2017), LexBlog (blog), archived at <https://perma.cc/Y7AW-4VT6>.

Roger C Schonfeld, “Elsevier Acquires bepress“, (August 2, 2017), The Scholarly Kitchen (blog), archived at <https://perma.cc/V9HZ-9BA4>.

Roger C Schonfeld, “Reflections on ‘Elsevier Acquires bepress’ Implications for Library Leaders“, (August 7, 2017), Ithaka SR (blog), archived at<https://perma.cc/PDT9-Z22F>.

What Was Bepress” (August 9, 2017) Gavia Libraria (blog), archived at <https://perma.cc/VY62-87NW>.

Return of the Spindle Whorl

Among the many pieces of  Legacy Art installed at the Law Library is Susan Point’s Good Luck (Double Salmon Spindle Whorl), 1998 . The piece was on loan to the Vancouver Art Gallery from February until June, for the show Spindle Whorl, which was devoted to Point’s prints and sculptures. The exhibit catalog is available in the Library. The piece was returned on June 8th, coincidentally during the  Faculty’s  hosting of the 2017 joint conference of the Canadian Association of Law Teachers (CALT) and the Association for Canadian Clinical Legal Education (ACCLE).  Good Luck was reinstalled to a prominent,  welcoming location in the Law Library.

 

Good Luck (Double Salmon Spindle Whorl) 1998 Susan Point. Photo by Kim Nayyer

 

 

National Aboriginal Day, June 21

National Aboriginal Day has been observed in Canada since 1996, when the  Proclamation Declaring June 21 of Each Year as National Aboriginal Day was declared by the Governor General  of Canada, Roméo LeBlanc.   One of the recommendations of the 1995 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) was the creation of such a day.   Link to a searchable database of the fulltext of the RCAP final report, hearings, and other documents at Library and Archives Canada . 

The official version of the proclamation  (PC1996-0785) was published as a Statutory Instrument; see  the full text of  SI/96-55   on the Justice Laws Website or in the Canada Gazette Part 1.

More information about the proclamation the day  and can be found on these websites:

 

Chief Justice McLachlin Announces Retirement

On June 12, 2017, Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin announced that she would be retiring from the Supreme Court of Canada on December 15, 2017. Justice McLachlin joined the SCC in 1989 after serving on the BC Court of Appeal and as Chief Justice of the BC Supreme Court. In 2000 she became the first woman to be named Chief Justice of the SCC, and she is now the longest serving Chief Justice. Prime Minister Trudeau remarked, “Chief Justice McLachlin’s judicial accomplishments are unparalleled in Canadian history. She has been a judicial leader and trailblazer for almost four decades. […] After 28 years at the Supreme Court of Canada, her contributions reach into every part of our law.”

UVic Team with the Chief Justice at the Wilson Moot, February 2017. L-R: Heather Purves, Leigh Stansfield, Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, Caitlin Ehman, and Samuel Maroney. Source: Supreme Court of Canada Collection, Michael Bedford, photographer.

Chief Justice McLachlin will be remembered for her effective leadership, her clear writing, and her court’s landmark decisions. As Chief Justice, McLachlin has often led her court to reach consensus, even in controversial cases such as Canada (Attorney General) v. Bedford, 2013 SCC 72. She has used the term “cultural genocide” to describe Canada’s treatment of First Nations, and she penned the first SCC case that recognized Aboriginal title, Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia, 2014 SCC 44. In her retirement announcement she expressed, “It has been a great privilege to serve as a justice of the Court, and later its Chief Justice, for so many years. I have had the good fortune of working with several generations of Canada’s finest judges and best lawyers. I have enjoyed the work and the people I have worked with enormously.”

We shall see who will be named the next Chief Justice and who will be elevated to the SCC. McLachlin’s place on the bench will be filled under the new Supreme Court of Canada Judicial Appointments Process introduced by the Trudeau government in August 2016. This is an open and transparent application process led by an Independent Advisory Board. The Board has a mandate to recommend “qualified, functionally bilingual candidates who reflect a diversity of backgrounds and experiences,” but it is not obligated to follow the convention of regional representation on the SCC. In the fall of 2016, Justice Malcolm Rowe became the first justice to be appointed to the SCC under the new process. Justice Rowe, the first SCC justice from Newfoundland and Labrador, replaced Justice Thomas Cromwell, the representative of Atlantic Canada, and so his appointment ultimately complied with convention.

You can find several of Chief Justice McLachlin’s publications in our library collection:

  • The Canadian law of architecture and engineering – Beverley M. McLachlin and Wilfred J. Wallace. Call Number: KF2925 M34.
  • British Columbia Court Forms (2nd Edition) – Beverley M. McLachlin and James P. Taylor, Edited by Fred Irvine. Call Number: KEB140 M25 2005.
  • British Columbia Practice (3rd Edition) – Beverley M. McLachlin and James P. Taylor, Edited by Fred Irvine. Call Number: KEB535.4 A6M25 2006.
  • A Canadian judgment: the lectures of Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin in New Zealand, April 2003 – Edited by Andrew Stockley and David Rowe. Call Number: KE8244 M34 2004.

Alberta Law Reform Institute Report: A New Trustee Act for Alberta

The Alberta Law Reform Institute issued its final report  A New Trustee Act for Alberta  today (March 1, 2017) outlining its recommendations for the enactment of new trust legislation. The Report recommends that the province adopt the Uniform Trustee Act (2012) prepared by the Uniform Law Conference of Canada  (ULCC) with some modifications to address current best practices and Alberta’s existing trust law.

Alberta isn’t the only province where reform of trust law is being considered. British Columbia has also considered adopting new trust legislation. In 2004, the British Columbia Law Institute (BCLI) issued its own final report A Modern Trustee Act for British Columbia. This report, largely served as the starting point for the ULCC’s Uniform Trustee Act (2012). UVic Professor Emeritus Donovan Waters, QC was heavily involved in the preparation of both documents. In 2014 the government of  British Columbia sought public comments on the Uniform Trustee Act and the BCLI final report to inform a possible new Trustee Act for the province.

So far, New Brunswick is the only Canadian province that has reformed its trust legislation based on the Uniform Trustee Act (2012). In June 2016, the Trustees Act, SNB 2015, c 21 came into force.

Check out the following items in the Law Library’s collection for more information about the reform of the law of trusts in Canada:

  • A modern Trustee Act for British Columbia : a report prepared for the British Columbia Law Institute. Call Number: KEB168 A72B74 and Online.
  • Uniform Trustee Act : final report of the Uniform Trustee Act Working Group. Online.
  • Waters’ Law of Trusts in Canada 4th ed. / Donovan W.M. Waters, Mark R. Gillen, and Lionel D. Smith. Call Number: KE787 W38 2012.
  • Oosterhoff, Albert H., “Trust Law Reform: The Uniform Trustee Act” (2015) 34:3 Estates, Trusts & Pensions Journal 329. Call Number: K5 S7292.
  • A New Trustee Act for Alberta – Alberta Law Reform Institute. Online.

Sixties Scoop Class Action: Brown v. Canada, 2017 ONSC 251

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice issued its decision this morning (February 14, 2017)  in the Ontario Sixties Scoop class action.

The court held that the Federal Crown owed and breached a “common law duty of care to take reasonable steps to prevent on-reserve Indian children in Ontario, who had been placed in the care of non-aboriginal foster or adoptive parents, from losing their aboriginal identity” (Brown v Canada, 2017 ONSC 251, at para 85).

The full court decision is available on The Globe and Mail website and will be available on CanLII later this week.

An archived stream of the ceremonial sharing of the decision at the Native Child and Family Services of Toronto with the representative plaintiff Chief Marcia Martel is available for viewing here.

On February 1, 2017 the Federal Government announced that it would seek to negotiate a national settlement to the “Sixties Scoop litigation’. The full press release can be found on the Government of Canada’s website.

For more background information on the Sixties Scoop, below are a few items in UVic Libraries’ collection:

  • A History of Adoption Law in Ontario, 1921 – 2015 (Chapter 9: Indigenous Children and Adoption) – Lori Chambers. Call number: KEO228 C53 2016 (Law Library)
  • A Generation Removed : The Fostering and Adoption of Indigenous Children in the Postwar World (Chapter 6: The Indigenous Child Welfare Crisis in Canada)- Margaret Jacobs. Call number: HV875.6 J33 2014 (McPherson Library)
  • Moving Toward Positive Systems of Child and Family Welfare (Chapter 3: Aboriginal Child Welfare) – eds. Gary Cameron, Nick Coady, and Gerald R. Adams. Online
  • A literature review and annotated bibliography on aspects of Aboriginal child welfare in Canada
    – Marlyn Bennett, Cindy Blackstock and Richard De La Ronde. Online.
  • Stolen from our Embrace : The Abduction of First Nations Children and the Restoration of Aboriginal Communities – Suzanne Fournier and Ernie Crey. Call number: E78 C2 F675 (McPherson Library)
  • Four Decades of Child Welfare Services to Native Indians in Ontario: A Contemporary Attempt to Understand the ‘Sixties Scoop’ in Historical, Socioeconomic and Political Perspective – Joyce Barbara Timpson. Online
  • Governing Childhood (Chapter V: Therapies of Freedom: The Colonization of Aboriginal Childhood) – Anne McGillivray. Call Number: HQ789 G658 (McPherson Library)
  • Richard Cardinal : Cry from a Diary of a Métis Child – National Film of Canada. Streaming video.
  • Native Children and the Child Welfare System – Patrick Johnston. Call number: E78 C2 J63 (Law Library)
  • No Quiet Place : Final Report Review Committee on Indian and Metis Adoptions and Placements – Edwin C Kimelman. Call Number: KF8210 C45 M36 1985 (Law Library)

 

 

 

Live Stream: State of Washington v Trump

The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit is set to hear oral arguments at 3:00 pm PST on whether the federal district court’s temporary nationwide injunction barring the enforcement of President Trump’s executive order on immigration should remain in place.

Oral arguments will be live streamed on the US Court of Appeals’ website at 3:00 pm PST. Students and faculty interested in listening to oral arguments can listen here. If anyone is unable to listen this afternoon, the hearing will also be archived and made available  by 12:00 pm PST on Wednesday, February 8. The archived hearing will be posted to the court’s YouTube channel here.

The court has also made available the parties’ written briefs and all amicus curiae briefs. All briefs are available on the court’s website.

#Research4Refugees: Resources from your UVic librarians

Kudos for your great work in #research4refugees, UVic Law students!

In the interests of expediency, we’re posting here the research resources you need to get started. Later, we can formalize into an more structured research guide. You will also find us at the law school or in the library on Saturday to offer a guiding hand.

And watch this space—It is growing by the minute!

New! (added 4:20 pm, Friday Feb 3)

We’ve added a brief list of relevant secondary sources available in the law library, a growing list at the bottom of this post.

Other sources (added 2:25 pm, Friday Feb 3)


And of course if you haven’t taken LAW 323 or LAW 342, don’t forget to orient yourself with some key secondary sources:

US resources

  • A brief overview of US legal research for Canadian legal researchers, with links to key sources:

US legal research 24 Feb 2016 CC ppt

Other commentary:

Bordering on Failure : Canada-U.S. Border Policy and the Politics of Refugee Exclusion , Harvard Immigration and Refugee Law Clinical Program, 2013.

Audrey Macklin, Disappearing Refugees: Reflections on the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement, (2004-2005) 36 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 365   The article provides background on the agreement such as below:

HANDS ACROSS THE BORDER:Working Together at our Shared Border and Abroad to Ensure Safety, Security and Efficiency. Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, December 2002

Government Response to the Report of the Standing Committee
on Citizenship and Immigration Safe Third Country Regulations, May 2003

(As we’re pulling this together pretty quickly, we might have typos or link errors in some of the content above. If you spot any, please inform us and we’ll fix asap.)

EU Asylum Policies [electronic resource] : the Power of Strong Regulating States / Natascha Zaun Cham, Switzerland : Palgrave Macmillan, 2017) ebook

Added July 2017