A Tale of Two “Sex Drugs” among Gay and Bisexual Men

Research with gay and bisexual men (GBM) in North America shows two distinct substance-use patterns related to sexual behaviour: 1) recreational drugs like methamphetamines, ecstasy and ketamine used to increase sexual pleasure; and 2) drugs ingested to enhance sexual performance, including erectile dysfunction drugs (EDD) like Viagra® , as well as amyl nitrates, or poppers.

For the purpose of this blog, we will focus on the enhancement-drug pattern, as EDD and poppers are associated with anal intercourse among GBM. For example, in Vancouver’s Momentum Health Study for GBM, participants reported on substance use within two hours before or during sex for up to five of their last sexual partners. Initial analysis of this event-level data provides the clearest link between substance use and sexual behaviour.  For example, insertive anal intercourse was almost three times more likely to occur with EDD relative to receptive anal intercourse. Poppers, which relax vascular smooth muscles, were almost two times more likely to accompany receptive anal intercourse than insertive intercourse.

Both drugs have a history in HIV studies. Pfizer, the pharmacological maker of Viagra®, successfully defended itself from lawsuits claiming that recreational use of Viagra® “caused” HIV/AIDS among San Francisco GBM. Poppers, originally developed as angina treatment, were so strongly associated with initial North American GBM HIV/AIDS cases that the disease was originally called GRID, standing for “Gay Related Immunodeficiency Disease”. Today, both drugs remain important factors in HIV epidemiological research, with analysis of the large US Multicenter AIDS Cohort showing EDD and popper use, singularly, or in conjunction, significantly increase the probability of HIV sero-conversion.

Despite these similarities, EDD and popper availability differs today. EDD are readily available and increasingly used recreationally by North American straight and GBM. In contrast, because of their psychoactive properties, poppers are increasingly restricted in North America.

Because Momentum is a longitudinal study taking place over a five-year period, we can look at patterns around EDD and popper use for Vancouver GBM. This blog invites discussion about their use and availability. For example, we know that some GBM regret recent Canadian restrictions on poppers, whose muscle relaxing properties may act as HIV harm reduction by reducing tearing of delicate rectal tissue, an event associated with HIV transmission.

We want to hear from you about these issues.

eric roth

Author: Dr. Eric Roth, Scientist, Centre for Addictions Research of BC; Professor, Department of Anthropology, University of Victoria

**Please note that the material presented here does not necessarily imply endorsement or agreement by individuals at the Centre for Addictions Research of BC

 

 

Sex and Drugs Blog Series: An Introduction

A headshot of Eric Roth

It is my pleasure to introduce and provide an overview for the next Centre for Addictions Research of BC theme in the Matters of Substance blog series. This upcoming theme is succinctly and provocatively entitled, Sex and Drugs. Our contributors will look at the intersection between substance use, sexual behaviour, pleasure and risk from a variety of perspectives and in a broad set of contexts. While all blogs are based on empirical data, authors also consider emerging theories attempting to explain substance use-sexual behaviour linkages.

Scanning upcoming blog titles I discern at least two major themes corresponding to current research on this topic. The first examines the relationship between sexual behaviour and the rationale for, and consequences of, associated substance use, while the second examines patterns and levels of substance use by sexual orientation. Upcoming blogs in the first theme examine the role of stigma in sex workers’ substance use patterns, the relationship between stimulant use and sexual compulsivity, also called sexual addiction, among gay and bisexual men (GBM), the advent and adoption of “sex drugs”, both legal and non-mood-altering (e.g. erectile dysfunction drugs such as Viagra®) and illicit and psychoactive (e.g. amyl nitrates or poppers) used to heighten sexual performance and/or pleasure, the role of drugs at GBM group sex parties, linkages between smoking and HIV, and a site-specific example of substance use and sexual behaviour in remote labour-based sites.

In the second theme, blogs examine linkages between substance use and sexual patterns for gay, bisexual, lesbian and transgendered populations. In doing so, they utilize a variety of Canadian data bases, including the SEX NOW national survey for GBM, the Centre for Addiction Research of BC’s High Risk Population Surveys, and a sample of transgendered men enrolled in the Vancouver Momentum Health Study for GBM.

Some upcoming blogs focus on defining and delineating levels and patterns of substance and sex related risk. At the same time, contributors are also cognizant of the far less discussed research topic of rewards, whether real, or just as importantly perceived, linking substance use with sexual behaviour. An excellent recent example of this was provided the Lorvick et al. (2013) study reporting San Francisco women’s perceptions of increased desire, power, and agency experienced when combining methaphetamine use with unprotected vaginal intercourse. Such studies emphasize that researchers today must recognize “sex positive” as well as “sex negative” aspects of substance use to fully understand this relationship. With this in mind, I invite you to follow our Sex and Drugs blog series, and to share with us your thoughts about the materials presented here.

eric roth

Author: Dr. Eric Roth, Scientist, Centre for Addictions Research of BC; Professor, Department of Anthropology, University of Victoria

**Please note that the material presented here does not necessarily imply endorsement or agreement by individuals at the Centre for Addictions Research of BC