Harm Reduction series – Page 8 – Matters of Substance

Ten years ago, community meetings held in Victoria on the subject of “what to do” about drug use in our community were typically loud, sometimes hostile, and certainly full of impassioned energy. Those of us who saw the lack of housing, absence of accessible washrooms, and dearth of health and social supports for people living on the streets spoke out about safety concerns, risk of disease transmission, and exposure of our children to some of the more devastating of human experiences. Those of us who worked with people who use illicit drugs, or perhaps admired the work that was being done just across the water in Vancouver at Insite and the Dr Peter Centre, spoke out about the need for increased access to health care services grounded in scientific evidence and compassionate care. The voices we never heard were those of people who were living on the streets, being crushed by the everyday weight of poverty, trauma, and addiction, and never considered part of the community to begin with.

The evidence showing the positive impact and efficacy that harm-reduction approaches to illicit drug use have on the health and well-being of local communities continued to accumulate as we debated in our town hall meetings and forums. Victoria is home to some of the brightest minds engaged in drug-policy reform, nursing care, direct support services, and addictions research, all whom have contributed to the stacks of reports, articles and blogs that support the need to increase access to harm-reduction services. The evidence has been in for a long time, but we apparently were not yet ready for it.

Since then, conversations have continued, broadened, and are no less impassioned when it comes to drug use in Victoria. Ten years of debate, evidence, community organizing and a slow-but-steady opening of our collective hearts and minds has brought us to a place where perspectives are not so divided. Ten years ago, I would not have believed my ears had I heard the conversations taking place today. Those of us who lashed out with anger and fear for the safety of our children now speak about how supervised injection services could be part of our community response to drug use and reducing risks for all. We talk about how we can share information, educate ourselves, listen to experiential knowledge, and work together to meet those moments where the impacts of poverty, trauma and addiction collide with pragmatic and empathic responses. Those of us who use illicit drugs speak out with wisdom and courage of our pain and our struggle—and, increasingly, we are being heard.

Harm-reduction services are a critically important part of how we respond to the reality of illicit drug use in our society. They are not a panacea for addiction, but they are proven to save lives, engage and support people who we typically despise and isolate, and increase the capacity of communities to reduce risk and improve overall health. Victoria is finally ready to put evidence into action.

The YES2SCS campaign (Yes to Supervised Consumption Services) has been created to harness the impassioned momentum that is continuing to move our community forward. The campaign includes healthcare professionals, people who use(d) illicit drugs, researchers, community activists, social workers, and individuals committed to social justice and public health. YES2SCS exists to unite the many Greater Victoria residents who know we can set the ground for supervised consumption services in our community. It’s time to harness this renewed energy and readiness to try new and effective strategies for caring for one another. We invite you to join us in asserting our capacity to create a healthier community for everyone!

To learn more about YES2SCS and to support the campaign through letter writing, petition signing, event organizing, and creating opportunities for dialogue, please connect with us:

yes2scs@gmail.com

www.yes2scs.ca

www.facebook.com/yes2scs‎

www.twitter.com/Yes2SCS

Author: Heather Hobbs, Coordinator of Harm Reduction Services for the South Island at AIDS Vancouver Island.

The slogan “Nothing About Us, Without Us” has been a daily mantra and practice in harm-reduction work for some time now. It has become much more commonplace to include people with lived experience of drug use and harm-reduction services in decisions that affect their lives. Navigating the intricacies of their inclusion has been both awkward and rewarding. But why include people with lived experience? How is this done? And most importantly, what’s in it for them? In this blog, I address these questions and share the life-altering impacts I have witnessed and personally experienced.

So who are “people with lived experience”? In the context of harm-reduction work, they are people who use or have used illegal drugs or pharmaceutical drugs non-medically, usually by injection or smoking. But it’s not that simple. I am not talking about the Toronto Bay Street stock broker who enjoys a bit of cocaine on the weekend. I am referring to people who are marginalized because of a complex mix of drug use and other factors and life conditions. These may include factors related to their age, gender, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, housing and homelessness status, life experiences of trauma and violence, or health conditions such as HIV and hepatitis C.

Our current drug laws have greatly exacerbated their exclusion from society. We criminalize people who use drugs, which fosters an anti-drug-user attitude and drives people away from services and social supports they may need. It also makes it difficult for service providers to reach them. We undervalue services for people who use drugs and poorly fund their care, treatment and support. We are reluctant to educate people about safer drug-use practices and to provide sterile drug use equipment, especially in prison.

Policy makers, service providers and researchers are experimenting with creative and innovative ways to include people with lived experience in decisions that affect their lives. The idea is that by bringing them into decision-making structures (committees, boards of directors, service delivery and research teams, etc.), we become allies by sharing the decision-making power, all the while striving to relate to each other in non-discriminatory, non-stigmatizing ways.

Research shows that including people with lived experiences has kept their priorities and needs in focus and resulted in better adapted services, the reduction of drug-use risk behaviours, and has played a role in improving life conditions, health and wellbeing. It has also provided people with lived experience with opportunities to reclaim their capacity to lead a self-determining life, something many of us more privileged people take for granted.

By working together, we learn about each other, bring our various strengths to the table, challenge our assumptions about each other, and reflect on how we interact, which leads to reduced stigma and improved rapport. People with lived experience come to view themselves more positively, inspire their peers, get meaning and a sense of purpose to help others and gain valuable life skills. The bottom line is we are all transformed by this experience.

Don’t get me wrong. Changing our societal ways and decision-making power structures is challenging. There are few models on how to include people with lived experience well and meaningfully. There are still barriers to their participation such as economic inequities, stigma and discrimination, limited resources and diverging agendas between various people at the table. People with lived experience often face health, financial and life priorities that make their participation challenging.

I am currently partnering with both the Drug Users Advocacy League and the Society of Living Illicit Drug Users for my PhD research to examine how decision-making power is shared in such committees. We aim to come up with some insights and helpful practice guidelines to assist all of us in better including people with lived experience.

People with lived experience are part of our communities. “Nothing About Us, Without Us” includes ALL of us.

Author: Lynne Belle-Isle is a PhD candidate in the Social Dimensions of Health Program at the Centre for Addictions Research of BC at the University of Victoria. She is a National Programs Consultant with the Canadian AIDS Society and the Chair of the Canadian Drug Policy Coalition.

**Please note that the material presented here does not necessarily imply endorsement or agreement by individuals at the Centre for Addictions Research of BC

Category: Harm Reduction series

Victoria’s YES2SCS Campaign: From Evidence to Action

“Nothing About Us, Without Us”: the inclusion of people with lived experience in harm reduction decisions