Of powders and pills: designing a fentanyl awareness campaign

Fentanyl-related overdoses have dominated the headlines in BC—and across the country—over the past year. Deaths involving the synthetic opiate narcotic, which is roughly 50 to 100 times more toxic than morphine, have increased five-fold in British Columbia over the past three years. But despite repeated warnings from provincial public-health bodies and alerts through community-based harm reduction supply distribution sites, fentanyl overdoses continue to rise—particularly among people who do not inject drugs. Clearly, despite efforts on the contrary, the message was not getting through to this population of users.

If you live in BC, you may have seen these posters pop up in your Facebook feed or at a local bar over the past few months. They’re the result of a campaign put together by BC’s Drug Overdose and Alert Partnership (DOAP), a multi-sectoral committee which works closely to monitor harms and deaths from substance use. After an emergency meeting in January 2015, the DOAP set to work crafting a campaign that would get the word out to a population of substance users that traditional methods weren’t reaching.

A Know Your Source? campaign poster.
A Know Your Source? campaign poster.

Coroner’s data revealed that most of the people who were dying of fentanyl-related overdoses (deaths where fentanyl was detected, either alone or in combination with other drugs) were between 19 and 40 and were not injecting drugs, which meant they were likely not accessing harm-reduction-supply distribution sites and likely had missed the posters and alerts that had been put out through those avenues. DOAP members decided to develop a targeted public safety campaign aimed at people aged 19-40 using public posters, Facebook advertising and a website. Thus, the “Know Your Source? Be Drug Smart” campaign was born.

It’s one thing to decide how you are going to get the message out; deciding what the message will be is a totally different beast. We looked to campaigns like Toronto Crime Stoppers’ Cookin’ with Molly, as well as social marketing and behavior changed theories. The aim of this campaign was at the first stage of behavior change theory: to simply raise awareness about what fentanyl was, where it could show up, and how to deal with and prevent an overdose. Evidence from published literature also suggested that the best PSA campaign required input from the target audience, so we held two focus groups with youth.

As for the visual content, it was felt that the images needed to have a bit of shock value to grab the viewer’s attention, but have sufficient detail to convey the message. The idea was not to tell people to not use drugs (because we know that doesn’t work), but for people to learn about what might be in their drugs so that they could be aware of what to look out for. In some sense, the entire campaign took on a harm-reduction approach – we knew people were using and wanted to provide them adequate info to reduce harms from fentanyl use.

After the working group developed draft messages and posters, they were reviewed by staff working in the areas of public health, mental health and substance use, young professionals who personally use drugs or have friends who use drugs in social settings, and at-risk youth who use substances in social settings, including at music festivals or concerts. Feedback helped us to tweak the campaign images and campaign taglines into ones that drug users were more likely to respond to. Public health staff worked with the BC Coroners Service and the BC Drug & Poison Information Centre to compile accurate information about fentanyl for the public and for health care professionals. All the information was integrated into a central website, Know Your Source, a one-stop shop for tips on prevention, harm reduction and treatment.

pacman
These PacMan posters have been popping up around Vancouver.

As fentanyl-associated deaths continue, the Know Your Source campaign provides accurate information and resources across the country. The messages have also inspired some people to create their own posters; these Pacman themed posters have been spotted around Vancouver. The Know Your Source awareness posters and messages have been adapted for use in Alberta and Saskatchewan, and discussions are underway for their use in Manitoba and Ontario.

 

Ashraf

Author: Ashraf Amlani, Harm Reduction Epidemiologist, BC Centre for Disease Control

 

Danger on the dance floor: ecstasy impurity

In 2013, Miley Cyrus released a song called We Can’t Stop, which was controversial because of the words, “We like to party, dancing with Molly.” The controversy comes from the name Molly, which is a reference to a synthetic stimulant also known as MDMA or ecstasy. This drug has been popular for decades, commonly used at raves, clubs, and music festivals, and renowned for its effects that include increased energy and feelings of closeness and empathy towards others.

Ecstasy has been in the news a lot lately. Not just because of its references in popular culture, but because of its impurity and the resulting harms. While pure ecstasy should contain MDMA only, it sometimes contains other chemicals, such as PMA or PMMA, which is nicknamed Death because of its toxic effects. For example, 27 people in Western Canada died between July 2011 and April 2012 after they ingested ecstasy that contained PMMA. More recently, last year, two young adults died at the Veld Music Festival in Toronto after they consumed drugs that they probably thought were MDMA. Similarly, this year there have been multiple incidents at North American music festivals where attendees have suffered negative effects due to drug use, including ecstasy use, including the Chasing Summer Festival in Calgary.

Drugs sold as ecstasy are sometimes adulterated with other chemicals or contain no MDMA at all. To make matters worse, individuals cannot know the exact contents of tablets or powder sold as ecstasy based on their appearance. So what can people do to avoid “bad ecstasy”?

Here are two options:

1) Laboratory testing. People can send ecstasy to a laboratory pill testing program called the Ecstasy Data Program. Individuals can anonymously mail samples to the laboratory at the cost of $40 to test tablets or $100 to test powder, and in two to three weeks the organization will post the results of the analysis online. It is important to note that the laboratory can only detect active chemicals and chemicals that their instruments are capable of detecting, and the laboratory is only allowed to post the ratio of active chemicals, not the quantity.

2) Testing kits. Although laboratory testing is fairly accurate, ecstasy users may not want to pay the fee or they may not want to wait a few weeks to find out what is in their ecstasy. So do-it-yourself reagent testing kits, are a more convenient option since they produce results within minutes. To use the kit, you apply reagents to an ecstasy sample, and chemical reactions will produce colours, which can be compared to a chart that shows colours produced by different drugs. Test kits cost about $20 to $65 online, depending on the type of kit. Harm-reduction organizations often promote the use of testing kits because they are helpful in showing if an ecstasy sample contains no MDMA; however, they cannot reveal if a sample is pure MDMA nor the quantity of MDMA it contains. While testing kits are imperfect, they can provide a significant level of protection to users as long as they are aware of the limitations of the kits.

It is important to understand that even if a drug is pure MDMA it can still have adverse effects. Firstly, consuming a high dose of MDMA is dangerous, which is why groups in the United Kingdom recently started the Crush-Dab-Wait Campaign to help protect people when they are taking MDMA crystals. Secondly, an individual might have a bad, possibly deadly, reaction to even a small, pure dose of MDMA.

Ecstasy users should inform themselves of the harms and risks associated with ecstasy use, especially in regard to impurity, so they can help protect themselves if they choose to “dance with Molly.”

 

Callas-Melanie
Author: Melanie Callas, MA Candidate, Department of Anthropology, University of Victoria