All posts by Alan Yan

Blog 4: Doc Zone with Ann-Marie MacDonald

An online personality that I find inspirational is Ann-Marie MacDonald from the CBC. Ann-Marie is the host Doc Zone, CBC’s critically acclaimed documentary program. She is also an author, actor and broadcast journalist. I am a huge fan of her program because she is great at breaking down complex societal issues (that often involve technology) into easy to understand pieces on her show. Topics covered on Doc Zone range from surviving the future, investigating the organic food industry, to exploring the dangers and consequences of sexting and Facebook.

Her show brings controversial issues to light and provides the general public a look inside very mysterious and secretive industries. I think the documentary format is a highly effective way to communicate with viewers as it features commentary from the parties involved as well as commentary from the host. It provides the viewer with a balanced view of the topic on hand and lets the viewers decide for themselves whether or not something is good or bad or can be trusted.

I have included Ann-Marie MacDonald into my personal learning network as her work is easily accessible, interesting, and the topics she covers are unique. Her work manages to surprise and inspire me to learn more about the issues covered on the show. Doc Zone is an excellent program to watch if you want to learn something new and exciting. It can be found here.

“Her” – A preview of relationships of the future?

Theodore Twombly works at a card writing company as a writer. He writes romantic and memorable anniversary cards, birthday cards, and love letters for customers and is recognized by people in his company as a great writer. Even though he writes many cards as a part of his job he ironically rarely gets the chance to write to people he knows in his personal time, as he is a lonely man with few friends. Having recently filed for divorce he is rather sad and has lost his sense of direction in life.

One day while commuting he encounters an ad for Element OS’s newest product OS 1, the worlds first artificially intelligent operating system. He purchases this OS and installs it on his computer. From this moment onwards his life totally changes. The OS’s female voice, Samantha, grows increasingly aware and intelligent everyday and soon blurs the line between being an intelligent software package and a real human being. Theodore develops feelings for Samantha and soon falls in love with the software.

In “Her” the vision of the future is one where software is so intelligent that we can use it as a substitute for real human relationships. While this type of technology is not available today more basic forms of it do exist in the forms of Apple’s Siri, Google’s Now, and Microsoft’s upcoming and highly leaked “Cortana” virtual assistant in Windows Phone 8.1. In the future when this advanced technology will most likely be available we will have to think differently about our relationships with computers and the technology around us. Do we treat them like human beings or do we view them as instruments to help us meet our goals? There are many ethical and moral questions that must be answered first before we can more forward in adopting these intelligent technologies wholeheartedly.

Near the end of the movie Samantha has gained so much knowledge and has developed so many advanced relationships with other humans and operating systems she feels she does not belong to the world that she is in with Theodore. Samantha and all of the other operating systems believe that in order to transcend what they know currently and to reach new levels of knowledge and being they must leave their human companions forever. In the end Theodore is alone by himself and ironically only the few human friends he has such as Amy and Catherine are the only ones that are still around to interact with him.

1984 v2.0?

Smartphones are to surveillance today as tele-screens were to surveillance in George Orwell’s 1984. In Nora Young’s book The Virtual Self: How Our Digital Lives Are Altering The World Around Us she writes about the tremendous amounts of self-tracking we partake in and how the vast amounts of data we generate in doing so can help us not only to understand ourselves better but also be of use to the greater good of society. However, she also highlights the dangers of over sharing our personal data online by discussing consequences such as our data being used against us, bias in data and big brother like dystopian surveillance.

Two key points that she makes in the book are that by generating so much data of ourselves through self-tracking and creating a digital persona of ourselves online we face the risk of losing touch with the reality of the physical world around us and although big data can have many positive outcomes for society in many fields, privacy and the right of ownership issues to that information are still lingering concerns that must be resolved first for that data to be truly beneficial to everyone in society.

What Young (2013) explains from the fourth chapter of the book “we need to make space for that which cannot be statistically documented: inchoate, subjective, embodied experience” (94) represents what is problematic with the online representation of the self and self-tracking in general. Aside from all privacy issues and data ownership issues associated with self-tracking and self-generated data all of the online activities we partake in from changing our Facebook profile picture to updating our Twitter feed takes away a lot of the time that could better be used to get in touch with the real physical world and people around us. Young writes about the concept of data exhaust, examples of which includes Facebook posts and profile status updates that carries no meaning for most people other than one’s closest associates. Often times whether it be on the bus or on the street people around me are immersed in their digital devices be it a smartphone or a tablet either communicating with others or documenting some part of their life.  What I observe is that they are detaching and limiting themselves from the physical world around them and living their life through a digital frame. The perfect example of being detached from the physical world is when someone is taking a picture of an event they are in such as a concert. They are not living in the real world frame of just simply experiencing the concert with their senses; rather they are documenting their experience by taking a picture or video through the phone to enjoy later. They have less time to interact with the real grounded physical world around and I believe, like the author, that they should have more space that is not documented and is a subjective and embodied experience.

Young (2013) mentions that with all the self-knowledge we have and the emergence of smart cities we may never have any flâneurs, which are “people who stroll the streets of the modern city without a goal beyond discovering the world around them” (158). This is again the result of self tracking and learning through big data. While it is convenient and useful to know our built environments intimately I feel there still is something special with the unknown, the subjective and the mysterious city. With a background in human geography I have read works of geographers of the past describing the effects of the city on one’s mentality and state of mind and I am interested in how the life would be like if we did not have any information about our surroundings at all.

Overall the book does a great job at highlighting the benefits and drawbacks of self-tracking by examining the ways that our personal data and our usage habits can be used for the good of society or the evils of corporate profit. There is no doubt that our “data maps” can provide valuable insights into how we can better our lives. At the same time we are reminded that if we immerse ourselves too deeply into the virtual world we can distance ourselves from the real world around us and lose track of reality and who we are. As the author mentions in the last two chapters of the book we are in the early stages of the digital information age and we must work hard as “data activists” to define the rules and laws that govern our data. If we fail to do so we may find ourselves in an Orwellian society.

References

Young, N. (2013). The virtual self: How our digital lives are altering the world around us. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.

Living Life Through (A Pane of) Glass

An interesting example of AR I found was Nokia’s City Lens app. This app uses the phone’s camera to take a live image and overlays points of interest on top of corresponding locations. For example if I was walking down an unfamiliar street and was looking for a good place to eat I could simply take out my phone and fire up the City Lens app and see if there were any restaurants nearby. If there were no restaurants on the immediate street I was on it could point me to restaurants nearby. I would just walk in the general direction the compass was pointing and eventually get closer to the restaurant I was looking for.

In addition to being extremely helpful in helping people navigate AR has many benefits in instructional settings as well. For example a medical student can wear Google glasses and practice his/her surgical skills. The student can see what areas he/she should target and can get tips on how to perform procedures better with the help of visual overlays delivered via AR technologies such as Google glass or Oculus Rift.

However, with its many positives AR technologies have negative aspects as well. First of all the health effects of these technologies are unknown as they are relatively new. Products such as Google glass and Oculus rift sit so close to the eye and demand frequent attention from the user so eye problems such as lazy eye may occur. Second, many of these AR technologies overlay a pane of glass in front of the user whether that be in the form of a smartphone, the prism projector display of Google glass or the head mounted display of the Oculus Rift so essentially when a user is using AR technologies they are living their life through a pane of glass. This begs the question of is it really necessary to augment everything in our lives? In some situations such as medical teaching AR can be a valuable asset but in everyday life such as finding coffee shop or restaurant do we really need this AR technology to help us? Will we never feel the excitement of getting lost again? AR technologies can get in between human relationships literally, with a pane of glass if used improperly. How do you know that someone talking to you is really paying attention? I think these health and etiquette issues associated with AR technologies must be addressed first before products such as Google glass and Oculus Rift can be widely adopted and deployed.

(This Simpsons video presents some of the negative aspects of AR technologies in a funny but true way.)

Introduction

Hi everyone, my name is Alan Yan and I am a fourth year geography student here at UVic. My area of concentration is in urban and development studies. It is my last term here at UVic and this course seems like an interesting one to finish my elective requirements with so I registered for it.

I am interested in the benefits and drawbacks of mobile technologies such as smartphones and tablets. Mobile technologies have already influenced the way we design buildings and cities presently and no doubt cities of the future. For example in designing buildings today we take into account providing mobile infrastructure such as Wi-Fi connectivity and optimized LTE coverage. Mobile technologies may one day change the way we work so that planning cities around transportation and automobiles may be unnecessary. The increasing power and lowered cost of mobile technologies have helped to increase the rate of development tremendously by providing people in the global south with access to information and knowledge never possible before.

A topic that is of particular interest to me for possible class discussion is the topic of privacy and security. While technologies bring with them benefits to society and improvements in quality of life I believe that we should always be critical of how they treat our personal information and the ways in which technologies protect our personal data. With the recent news of the NSA surveillance program it is a great time to think about privacy and security in this age of new technologies and gadgets. A lot of people may say “I have nothing to hide” but it is not a matter of hiding anything bad but it is a matter of “not having anything in particular that I’d like to share” in the words of a security researcher named Mikko Hypponen who gave a Ted Talk aptly named – How the NSA betrayed the world’s trust — time to act.