In Table A (linked; see also Appendices), a summary of teaching evaluations and student ratings on instruction and learning experiences are provided for all courses that I taught from Spring 2011 to Spring 2017 terms (study leave from July 2017 to June 2018).
Overall and across criteria in the Course Experience Survey (CES), student assessment of teaching in a 5-point scale has ranged from good (3) to excellent (5). Not all data are available in all courses. For example, in the NUHI 801 course (Summer 2015) none of the already small number of students (n=3) responded in the CES. Usually, only up to 50% of the enrolled students complete the CES. It is impossible for us to know how the remaining students assess/experience teaching. Nevertheless, the mean and median scores illustrate consistently strong evaluation of instructor effectiveness that ranges from 3.00 to 4.43 (mean) or from 3.00 to 4.50 (median) out of 5.00. There are a couple of exception, though, such as in the NURS 360 course (Spring 2016) that I taught it for first time, in which five students from 24 enrolled evaluated instructor effectiveness as 2.40 (mean)/2.00 (median). Scores for learning experiences range from 3.00 to 4.44, while the score in the NURS 360 course (Nursing Research) is lower (2.60/2.00) indicating that this course needs more attention. Also in the doctoral course NURS 604b, students assessed instructor effectiveness 2.89 (mean)/3.00 (median) and their learning experience of 2.78/3.00 out of 5.00. Finally, the large standard deviations (e.g., 1.67, 1.55, 1.41, 1.27, 1.48) indicate a great range of student ratings among the respondents that also needs attention.
In addition, four students/alumni have provided support letters (linked):