Guest Speaker Series – Vanessa Winoneok on December 11, 2020

Methods for Speculative Pedagogies - A Research Conversation on 'Walking-with'
Wednesday, December 11, 5:30 - 7p.m.
Location: Bldg A Atrium
Guest Speaker: Vanessa Winoneok, PhD Candidate, Edith Cowan University, Perth Australia, W.A. Australia.

Vanessa is “interested in experimental and creative methodologies [and is] currently developing speculative pedagogies by walking-with Derbarl Yerrigan, educators, and young children in Perth.”  She will present to us  on her ongoing ‘walking-with’ research with Mindy Blaise, educators and children in Perth, Australia.

For those of you who are able to attend, you might find Weather Wanderings (Blaise, Rooney & Pollitt, 2019) valuable to look at prior the session.  It is a 3-page article that is grounded in walking-with weather pedagogies.

We wander: not to watch children progress to the next developmental milestone, nor to see them navigate a weather world where they are at the centre, but, rather, to wonder with unfolding, lively and, sometimes, unruly weathering-with relations. Our weather wanderings
are a type of ‘slowing down’ that Isabelle Stengers (2018) advocates. It renders us attentive (Stengers, 2015), and opens new pathways and possibilities for coming to know the world.

Gatherings of/with/in Collectivity Session 1

 

Gatherings of/with/in Collectivity Session 1
Tuesday, December 3, 5:30pm-7pm
Location: Harry Lou Poy Bldg Atrium
Potluck (please bring small item for sharing)
Reading/resources: FreshEd podcast #180; Peter Moss (2014) pages 89-91 from chpt excerpt, Sylvia Kind, Collective Improvisations

My image of the educator is similar, ‘rich’ and competent with enormous potential, and active learner co-constructing knowledge in relationship with others, not least children, with the school as ‘a place where adults and children learn together’ (Hoyuelos, 2013, p. 126)…This educator is a reflective practitioner, a theorist and critical thinker, aware that ‘when you do practice, it’s because you have a theory…[and that when you] think, it’s because there’s a practice behind it (ibid, p. 191)…She is also a researcher and experimentor, seeking new understandings, new knowledge, new ideas, these identities manifested in various ways: ‘as a way of thinking of approaching life, of negotiating, of documenting’. (Moss, 2014, p. 89)

What does it meant to de-centre the educator in ECE practice?  How do we do this in a way that honours educators as participants in the process of learning without leading us into the trap of making ourselves disappear in the process of engagement?  Is there a line between engaging children in conversation and imposing our beliefs on them?  

 

Cedar Storytelling for Earthly Survival

Cedar Place has been trying to come together, as a collective, to learn to tell stories together.  New stories.  It began with a discussion about a tree being cut down behind the centre.  The children were intrigued, curious, and affected by the process of the tree coming down.  It was noisy.  It required ropes but little discussion or warning that this was going to happen (my understanding is that workers came and took the tree down quite quickly).  Some of the children retold the story to their parents over many days.

We’ve been thinking with Donna Haraway’s concept of “storytelling for earthly survival”.  Johanna and Diana have been making space for Key to take the lead in storying the life of a tree.  Many trees.  But one in particular that now lives in their centre.  Its life story is unfolding on the wall (with markers and paint) while children sit in a circle to listen and engage.  Some children shout back at Key-tree as she tells stories.  Others sit silently watching.  Some squirm and try to walk away (but not as many as you might think).  Most seem interested to see what is happening.  Some try get up very close to Key-tree to watch her paint.   Some notice who goes in and out of the circle.  These moments of coming together have become somewhat of an event where Key puts on her tree hat and become ‘Key-tree-story-teller’.

Fabrizio Terranova (2016) created a film called ‘Donna Haraway: Storytelling for Earthly Survival’, whose “contributions to feminist studies of science and technology resist and even rebel against hegemonic ways of thinking and living. But what form should such stories take? What might they sound or feel like?”

 

 

It is Donna Haraway’s ideas about “storytelling for earthly survival” that came to mind when Cedar first met with me (Narda) to discussed inquiry ideas for experimenting with ‘collectivity’.  It still does.  I am fascinated by everyone’s openness to keep trying to tell new stories with the children as a collective and the way that the children ‘stick with it’, you all ‘stick with it’ and how much effort everyone is doing to ‘stick with it’ even if there have been uncomfortable moments and moments of not knowing where things are going.

In the film, Donna Haraway talks about what is required to do restorative, collective work in the process of striving to create more livable worlds.  Whatever we decide ‘it’ is (that is, whatever we decide is the focus/problem/issue we need to work on together)…She says:

"The only way to come to grips with 'it'.  To come into the presence of 'it' is to constantly keep doing positive things.  You have to keep trying to make an experiment work.  You have to constantly keep writing this particular story, not some story in general, but this story...The only possible way is to - again and again and again - engage each other in doing something."

Last week’s inquiry time took a turn…

Original intentions to go to the forest were derailed by the wind and parental concerns about safety after a large branch fell in front of a parent’s car (?).  The children were excited to go outside when I arrived, but instead of simply saying no or trying to redirect their attention away from the wind Key, Johanna and Diana decided to ‘stay with the trouble’ of the wind and invite the children to think about why we could not go to the forest.  They met the children’s desire with respect and created the conditions for them to witness the wind and listen to the story it was telling with the trees.

With the wind pushing recycling around the parking lot (part of the story too), we watched huge Douglas fir trees sway as gusts of wind wound their way through with you all on the edge.  “Not today!!” shouted one child.  Another tried to run to collect recycling that was swirling in the parking lot (stopped by Xiao who picked it up with him).

Before we left a chorus of voices shouted encouragement to the trees:

“Hold on!!!!!!”

“Be strooooong!!!!”

“Hold on!!!”

 

We walked back to the centre.  Another tree-Key story emerged.

 

 

This time the story transformed children into hungry frogs, unsuspecting educators and a pedagogist into insect-infested trees, after the tree on the wall grew and changed in the process of the new story being told.  At the end of it all: frogs were fed, trees stopped itching, the tree on the wall grew a thicker trunk with a hole so the owls had a home.  All the while, the wind-story became something other than simply a shutting down or diverting attention story.

Peter Moss mentions ‘the Dark Mountain Project’ in a book that addresses the importance of learning to tell new stories in early childhood education: :

“We believe that the roots of the converging crisis of our times lie in the stories we have been telling ourselves…We will reassert the role of storytelling as more than mere entertainment.  It is through stories that we weave reality.” (Dark Mountain Project, 2009a)

“The Dark Mountain Project is a network of writers, artists and thinkers ‘who have stopped believing the stories our civilization tells itself…[as the world enters] an age of ecological collapse, material contraction and social and political unravelling’.  These once potent stories but now unbelievable stories, they contend:”

Tell us that humanity is separate from all other life and destined to control it; that the ecological and economic crises we face are mere technical glitches; that anything that cannot be measured cannot matter.  But these stories are losing their power.  We see them falling apart before out eyes. (Dark Mountain Project, 2009b)

Reference:

Middleton (2019):

https://culanth.org/fieldsights/storying-otherwise-a-review-of-donna-haraway-story-telling-for-earthly-survival

 

Quote of the Day: Affrica Taylor

The very notion of common worlds is an active, inclusive, more-than-human one which is borrowed from Latour (2004) but also inspired by Donna Haraway's (2008) generative and collective 'worldings'. More like an aspirational verb than a descriptive noun, common worlding or the commoning of worlds requires a persistent commitment to reaffirm the inextricable entanglement of social and natural worlds-through experimenting with worldly kinds of pedagogical practice. This means pushing past the disciplinary framing of pedagogy as an...exclusively human activity and remaining open to what it might mean to learn collectively with the more-than-human world rather than about it, acknowledging more-than-human agency and paying attention to the mutual affects of human-nonhuman relations." (Taylor, 2017, p.8)

Reference:

Taylor, A. (2017). Beyond stewardship: common world pedagogies for the Anthropocene. Environmental Education Research. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1325452

Cosmic Connections – Sitka

Celestial Connections (from Oct. 17th)

Narda:  What is this?  Someone brought a puzzle!

Child: That is Jupiter and there’s the astronaut.  It’s mine.  I brought it.

____, _____ and few others come in and out of the ‘puzzle space’, drawing tiny pictures while piecing together (and pulling apart) puzzle pieces on the table.

Narda:  Hmmm…Can you tell me about this picture?  It reminds me of our visit to the telescope.  The observatory.

Child (pointing to picture): This is a satellite. There’s the astronaut. Can I tell you something?  That’s what I'm going to be when I grow up!  I’m going to go out into space and take pictures!!

_______ (watching intently): agrees with _______ and points to more celestial bodies on the puzzle lid.

Narda: Oh wow.  Yes, I see him! (the astronaut)  Did someone take this picture?  There’s so much in it.

______: Yes (nodding) Someone took it.

Narda: Wait a second.  If this is a picture of the galaxy we live in, where are we in the picture?

_______: (points to Earth) Here!

_______: Yeah.  That’s Earth.  I’m drawing it.

Narda: So…let me get this straight…If we are there, talking together about space, who took the picture?

_______: Karun did.

 

 

 

We are here!

 

 

 

 

 

I was grateful for the opportunity to join you for the tour of the UVic Observatory.  The experience was amazing and still seems to be rippling out in interesting ways in the centre!  A few of the things that struck me most from the tour were:

  • The impact of our presence in the halls of the university (the children were met by many looks and smiles from students and staff)
  • Karun’s (Dr. Thanjavur’s) first question to the children: “Before we start talking about the planets, I have a question for you all: where are we right now? Who knows where we are?”
  • How knowledgeable the children are about the planets in our solar system (one child named most of the planets Karun drew on the white board)
  • How powerful the sun is! (poor Mr. Pencil)

 

 

Touched by the Universe

 

 

 

Shifting the telescope

 

 

Mr. Pencil didn’t listen!

It was a wonderful experience that has me thinking about how vast the universe is and how we come to understand ourselves as within it and connected (or not) to those celestial bodies.  Rather than re-tell the story of our trip (which you are more capable of re-telling from your own perspectives), I’m curious about the way this experience might continue to live and ripple out in connection with our collectivity inquiry.  What would it mean to reorganize pedagogy around our celestial connections?  How might we make space for other perspectives and render our multiple connections to the cosmos visible?  Is the universe part of our ‘collective’?

When ______ & ______ pointed out the astronaut on the puzzle box, I automatically referred to that figure as a ‘he’.  Space tends to be a masculinized and human-centric realm.  But things are changing; last week the world saw its first all-female space-walk! We are also not the only creatures who notice and orient themselves to the sun, stars, moon, etc.  Some plants are known for turning their faces toward the sun as it moves along the horizon and I’ve heard about a recent study that highlights the way dung beetles navigate themselves via the Milky Way. Who else does this?

During the tour, Angie turned to me and asked “Is this Common Worlds?”  Love that question and think it’s a fascinating one to continue thinking with!  We have been trying to ground and make meaningful connections with the ‘huge’ problem of climate change over the past few years.  Space feels similar in that ‘massive’ sense, that is, while it feels compelling to think with, it is also a bit daunting to get my head around this all-encompassing phenomenon (Space) in pedagogy and practice.  _____’s mom and Karun’s tour was a gift and catalyst to start thinking in this way.  The children already seem to have deep connections with the cosmos.  Pedagogically speaking, it feels important to orient ourselves in the universe, as Karun did at the beginning of our visit.  Technology is incredible and advancing all of the time.  It enables us to reach deeper and deeper into space, revealing more and more images and information about the solar system (and beyond).  Where are we in this process of ‘discovery’?  To whom must we be accountable in casting our imaginations beyond our own shared atmosphere?  What might creative engagement look and feel like when put to work with these concepts and knowledges?  What does it mean to think beyond the critical zone of our own planet’s generosity?  Just a couple of questions that come up for me.:)

French philosopher, Bruno Latour, talks about the impact of the modern image of a ‘blue globe’ has had on our collective psyche and how humanity in general tends to organize itself as separate from, rather than deeply entangled with and dependent on the soil, creatures, air, and others who compromise our collective home.  ______ showed me what it looks like to walk in space, telling me he had to take oxygen on his back to go into space.  He and ______ also pointed out an image of an astronaut learning to walk in space by going under water with divers.  How might we continue to engage children’s knowledge of (and fascination with) space and their everyday ideas/connections with the stars, moon, the sun, etc.?  What stories do you carry with you from your own childhood about the stars, moon, etc.?  How might we experiment together (through art, dance, song, discussion) in a way that renders our connections with the galaxy visible?

Expanding an idea:

Noticing and interpreting what children do and why they do it probes the connection between thinking and questioning and shows or makes visible the way children are making meaning of their learning or of their interaction with the world. As one interprets and critically reflects on a moment/observation, intriguing questions and insights can be gained without requiring absolute certainty about the situation. (BC ELF, 2019, p. 55)

For the most part, during our tour we were treated to a fascinating discussion and tour from a ‘Western science’ perspective, although Karun did bring in questions and more-than-human perspectives (like Mr. Pencil’s) that push at the boundaries of how we tend to get taught about non-human agency (which was delightful!).  Science and technology have given us incredible discoveries about space! But there are other approaches to science that offer their own situated insights into the relationality of the universe that we can learn from as well. Wilfrid Buck, from the Opaskwayak Cree Nation Elder, talks about the way that that “every culture in the northern hemisphere went out at night and saw the same stars…it wasn’t only Romans and Greeks looking up at the sky, it was everybody…We are related to the stars, we are star people”: https://www.cbc.ca/radio/unreserved/from-star-wars-to-stargazing-1.3402216/cree-mythology-written-in-the-stars-1.3402227

Here is another link to Indigenous science perspectives that emphasize cultural relations with the cosmos (“Not just quaint little stories”) https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/indigenous-astronomy-1.5077070   (includes link to video clip with Wilfrid Buck, Ask an Elder: Winter Solstice in the Cree Tradition)

More locally, here is a link to a 2018 article that highlights the cultural significance of renaming of a small planet ‘Tsawout’, after one of the 5 WSÁNEĆ bands in this area:

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/british-columbia/article-astronomers-name-minor-planet-after-vancouver-island-first-nation/

Chief Underwood noted the WSÁNEĆ people on Vancouver Island have looked to the stars for a lot longer than 100 years.  “The moon governed our seasons to fish, hunt and gather,” he said. “It’s quite neat that we had the science of that a thousand years ago.”

The WSÁNEĆ have historically tracked lunar cycles and recognized 13 different moons. Late-May to early June marks the moon CENTEKI, or the sockeye moon when the sockeye salmon would return to the straits around Vancouver Island and could be harvested. Other moons mark the coming of winter, spring harvest or strong winds.

Nick Claxton is an assistant teaching professor at the University of Victoria and a member of the Tsawout Nation. He says that the geography of Tsawout land has historically played into a reliance on the stars.  “Because our traditional territory is just as much marine environment as it is land, the knowledge of the tides and the currents and obviously the moon plays a big part,” he said.

He emphasized that institutional acts such as renaming Asteroid (402920) “Tsawout” – which translate to “houses on the hill” from the WSÁNEĆ language − are a way of valuing and promoting Indigenous knowledge.  “We’re still struggling to have our knowledge passed on to future generations, so this helps. It creates a sense of value and sense of identity,” Mr. Claxton said.

Will leave it there for now!  Looking fwd to hearing from you and continuing the conversation on Tuesday, Oct. 29th!

Thanks,

Narda

Quote of the day: how do we respond?

…there is nothing simple about ethical and political practice. No generalizations can be made as to how we practice, what we do, how we respond. Each pedagogical encounter requires a different kind of attention. There are no shortcuts for any of us. We just need to figure out, together in dialogue, how we want to respond or, more precisely, how we are able to respond. (Pacini-Ketchabaw et al., 2015, pp. 190-191)

 

Resource:

Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., Nxumalo, F., Kocher, L., Elliott, E., & Sanchez, A. (2015). Journeys: Complexifying early childhood practices through pedagogical narration. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.