Month: September 2023

MUS 116 CONCERT RESPONSE ASSIGNMENT

DUE DATES: OCT 12, NOV 2, NOV 20.

Your Concert Response should be on a live performance of music that you attend. There are many venues/opportunities to experience music in Victoria or wherever you are. It is suggested that you get approval of your concert choice in advance; inappropriate concert choices will affect your grade. Of course, in light of Covid fears (which I gather are still there) there is absolutely no obligation for anyone to physically attend a concert/gig. Live streamed events are entirely fine. As always, check in with me if you have questions.

Suggestions

Write the first draft of your report as soon as possible after the concert so your impressions remain fresh, but I don’t recommend writing full sentences during the concert. If there was a printed program, use it to remind yourself of what you heard when you write your report. Use the program as a way to helping yourself use correct terminology. Do not use the program notes as a substitute for your own thinking and personal reactions; do not cram your report full of historical tidbits about the piece. Comment on matters of historical background only if they directly influence your personal experience of the music at the event you attend. If there was not a program (which is common in jazz performances for instance) then make your own by jotting down titles of tunes/composers during the show.

Concert Response Format

Introduction (10% in length and value)

Briefly identify the concert. Who performed? What pieces were performed? Where was it performed? Briefly describe the performance space, physical surroundings, and the appearance of the performers.

Objective Description of the Music (30% in length and value)

Describe instrumentation, dynamics, texture, rhythm and tempo, form & relationships between movements, principles of design in the compositions, etc. –– Note extremes or what is most striking. How do these elements work together? Does the performance relate to the music covered in class in a meaningful way?

Subjective Reactions to the Music (50% in length and value)

Where was your attention directed? Was your attention held at all? Did you like individual pieces? Did you have emotional reactions to any particular piece? Why did you react the way you did? Was it in the composition, performance, sound, or all three? Did your mood change in the course of the concert? Was the concert full of variety or was it all more or less the same? Could the performance be better? How? Could the selection of compositions performed have been more to your 2 taste? Was this a familiar or a new experience? Was there a theatrical dimension to the performance? Conclusion (10% in value) Did you like or dislike the experience overall? Why or why not? What do you think could have made it more effective?

FURTHER STYLE SUGGESTIONS:

1. While details are good, ensure that you are guiding the reader into the world of sound you encountered through your words.

2. Begin with a clear topic sentence and an introductory paragraph that tells me what you are going to tell me.

3. After giving a general sense of your impressions in the introductory paragraph, give details and specific examples. Which of the two following examples is more interesting to read?

On saturday, I attended a performance of the by Joe Blow ata club in Victroia. I enjyed watching the singers as they sang. It was a intereting performance.

OR

On February 32nd, I attended a jazz performance by vibraphonist Joe Blow and his quartet at the Superior Café in Victoria. One of the most memorable aspects of this performance for me was the vivid facial expressions that I could see on some members of the quartet, which included piano, bass, and drums. One older gentleman, the drummer, in particular was striking to watch. Whatever the feeling was in the music, it was amplified in his rapid foot tapping gestures. He looked so relaxed during the up-tempo Charlie Parker tune Donna Lee. More peaceful, even joyous emotions seemed to register in his face when the music called forth those feelings of joy and peace, as in the beautiful ballad Body and Soul. Always try to be specific as possible. One could write, “the performance was exciting,” but is that entirely true? Surely some parts of the performance were more exciting than others and some were not exciting at all. Details give life and energy to writing.

4. If you have heard the piece before, especially on a recording, you may wish to compare the performance with the one with which you are familiar. Were some of the tempos faster or slower? Were some sounds more distinct or more blended? Is the balance within the ensemble different? Were rhythms more or less precise? Besides just listing differences that you noticed, tell me what those differences mean to you. It was 3 better because it was slower or it was less interesting because it was slower or louder or softer . . .

Y’all have been offering such interesting questions that I made a specific QUESTIONS page where I will post them, and any answers, anonymously. Right now there’s some stuff there from previous years that I imagine will be useful for this prompt. Thank you for your energy and attention thus far.

PROMPT 2 due in class mon sept 25

Please throw yourself fully into this thought experiment.

Imagine that a ghost arrives on Earth who erases all music of the past. Every score, every recording, every history book, every performance of every single piece of music written in the past is suddenly and mysteriously vanished. You can recall names of great composers (e.g. Mozart, Handel) but you can recall nothing of their artistic contributions. What is now available is only music of the present day in September 2023.

First, discuss any ethical implications of playing music exclusively of the past. Then please write about the music you would then perform on your instrument and include any links to this music, if possible. Why are you including the music you select? Finally, offer your cogent opinion on this quote from Nietzsche:

If you are to venture to interpret the past, you can only do so out of the fullest exertion of the present. Only when you put forth your noblest qualities in all their strength will you divine what is worth knowing and preserving in the past. Like to like! Otherwise, you will draw the past down on you.

Word count for entire prompt: approximately 350 words. Thanks as always for your contributions inside and outside of class.

A WORD ABOUT FORMATTING

For this prompt

• no handwritten submissions
• double spaced, 12 pt font
• ensure it is stapled and clearly shows your FIRST and LAST name
• this assignment encourages a wide mind however the deadline is strict

THIS IS BLOG PROMPT 1. PLEASE COMPLETE AND RETURN VIA HARD COPY IN CLASS MON SEPT 11.

.BLOG PROMPT 1

Please view the above film about the incredible artist and thinker Leslie Laskey.  You can use this link if you want to watch it away from the course site.

Using these questions as a point of inspiration, please offer a 300 word response on the film.

1. Looking back at the “bones of summer” how have you engaged or created art? If you haven’t engaged or created art, please describe why.
2. What things, if any, surround you that you consider powerful?
3. Over the next couple of days, take note of the dominant sounds in areas that you consistently walk. What are the sounds you notice most of all? Be specific.
4. How do you relate to the phrase “free time only works if you steal it?”
5. Do you have any other takeaways from the film?

FAQ:

“Do we have to write 300 words on each question”

Answer: No.

“Is it 300 words overall or do we have to answer each question?”

Answer: I am looking for 300 words overall and no you don’t have to answer each question.