by Elisabeth Girgis-McEwen
When BC Housing asked me to speak about change leadership, I faced a familiar challenge: how do you measure progress when the path forward isn’t predictable? Construction professionals know this tension well : balancing immediate needs with the long-term, and working across sectors that don’t always speak the same language.
This week’s conversation at the MBAR roundtable (Mobilizing Building Adaptation and Resilience (MBAR) | BC Housing) ranged widely in approach: structured results pyramid, community consensus and personal sense-making. Each has its value. I chose to speak about why we in the BPiBS project are putting energy into learning KPIs.
Traditional KPIs have long served me well. When I first led a project and program management office, they gave clarity and accountability. Activities led to outputs, outputs to outcomes, outcomes to impact. That chain works for well-bounded projects. But the housing system is not a tidy chain. It is a shifting landscape.
The reality is: change is not easy. It means balancing priorities, stepping outside comfort zones, and moving forward even when the way isn’t clear. In my own work, this has meant championing the environment as a building code objective, drawing attention to under-representation in design, and supporting reconciliation through First Nations’ self-determination in asset decisions. None of these were in a plan, but each became possible by paying attention in the quiet moments, asking what would truly move the work, and trusting the skills and support around me.
BPiBS exists to mobilize best practice knowledge. The project is not a regulatory effort. It does not force actors to collaborate. Instead, it helps knowledge move across domains so the simplest path forward becomes more visible—even when it isn’t the easiest.
Continue reading









